- Yu Hongyuan
- Senior Research Fellow
- Center for European Studies
- Institute for comparative politics and public policy Director
- Seeking for the International Relat...
- China’s Foreign Policy under Presid...
- Three Features in China’s Diplomati...
- The Contexts of and Roads towards t...
- Building a more equitable, secure f...
- The Green Ladder & the Energy Leade...
- Lu Chuanying interviewed by SCMP on...
- EU aviation tax generates heat, and...
- How 1% Could Derail the Paris Clima...
- If America exits the Paris Accord, ...
- The Establishment of the Informal M...
- China’s Energy Security and Sino-US...
- Opportunities and Challenges of Joi...
- Evolution of the Global Climate Gov...
- The Energy-Water-Food Nexus and Its...
- The Energy-Water-Food Nexus and I...
- Sino-Africa Relationship: Moving to...
- China’s Role in the Transition to A...
- Arctic Shipping and China’s Shippin...
- Comparison and Analysis of CO2 Emis...
- Leading the Global Race to Zero Emi...
- BRI in Oman as an example: The Syn...
- Coronavirus Battle in China: Proces...
- China’s Fight Against COVID-19 Epid...
- Revitalize China’s Economy:Winning ...
- China's growing engagement with the...
- Perspectives on the Global Economic...
- International Cooperation for the C...
- Working Together with One Heart: P...
- The Tragedy of Missed Opportunities
Jun 07 2017
Evolution of the Global Climate Governance System and Its Implications
By Yu Hongyuan
International
system
climate
diplomacy
governance
structure
Climate change has emerged as one of the top security challenges in the early 21st century. It is now widely acknowledged that international cooperation and collective action will be the key to addressing challenges caused by climate change. This article will give an explanation on the evolution of the global climate change governance system by linking history, governance, and diplomacy. The challenge of climate change involves not only international competition for new energy but also related adjustments in the global governance pattern. Specifically, the carbon emission reduction to be discussed at the 2015 UN Paris Climate Conference will still be problematic, and negotiations with regard to financing mechanisms between developed and developing countries will remain in doubt. Furthermore, the attitudes of the two sides toward common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and the intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) are disparate. In addition, negotiations among China, the UN, the U.S., and the EU are decisive in tackling this tricky matter. Finally, this article outlines some potential diplomatic options for China's future developmental trend.
Evolution of the Global Climate Governance System and Its Implications
Source of documents:《China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 》
more details: