Yan Anlin
Senior Research Fellow
Institute for Taiwan, Hongkong & Macao Studies
Related Articles Commentary Paper SIIS Report
Feb 05 2012
Cross-Strait Relations in Ma Ying-jeou’s Second Term
By Yan Anlin
Mr. Ma Ying-jeou’s unexpectedly wide margin over Democratic Progressive Party candidate Tsai Ing-wen, in Taiwan’s January 14, 2012 election shows that the majority of the Taiwanese public not only approves of Ma’s image and administration, but also supports Ma’s efforts in pushing the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations during his first term. Thus, the cross-Strait relationship is very likely to remain at the top of Ma’s policy agenda in the next four years.

I. The principles of Ma’s cross-Strait policy in his second term

The past election season witnessed a sharp discrepancy between the pan-Blue and pan-Green coalitions on whether to recognize the “1992 Consensus.” Ma’s successful reelection proves that his maintenance of the “1992 Consensus” has been endorsed by the public. Therefore, we can expect Ma’s cross-Strait policy in his upcoming term to feature three continuations: first, the continuation of the policy to promote peaceful reconciliation across the Taiwan Strait; second, the continuation of “no negotiation on reunification, no seeking independence, and no use of force” across the strait; and third, the continuation of enhancing the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations while emphasizing “one China, different interpretations.” In essence, Ma’s second term will focus on consolidating the peace across the Strait that he established during his first-term.

II. Possible trends of Ma’s cross-Strait policy

First, Ma will continue to enhance cross-Strait exchanges and cooperation on the basis of the ECFA signed in 2010, so that Taiwan can better cope with the ongoing global economic crisis and increase participation in East Asia economic cooperation.

SecondMa will likely maintain the principle of economics first, education and culture next, and then politics. The negotiation of the four follow-up agreements of the ECFA on investment protection, goods trade, service trade and dispute resolution mechanisms will be prioritized .An educational agreement may be signed, though considerable additional effort is likely needed before a cultural agreement is reached.

Third,, Ma’s team might start preparing for political discussions with the Mainland, and major think tanks across the Strait may also discuss issues regarding a peace agreement.

Whether such issues can be put on the SEF-ARATS negotiation table and a peace agreement can be reached depend on the resolution of Ma’s team, the development of cross-Strait relations, and the reactions of the international society.

 

Source of documents